Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:08:59 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: smp@freebsd.org, julian@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NETGRAPH broken with witness Message-ID: <20010223020859.A4771@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <3A963410.1C656DB3@elischer.org>; from julian@elischer.org on Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:57:36AM -0800 References: <20010222231154.A852@mollari.cthul.hu> <3A963410.1C656DB3@elischer.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:57:36AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > Apparently this was never tested: early in the boot phase I get the > > following panic: > > > > panic: spin lock netgraph worklist mutex not in order list > > > > and indeed the witness code appears to have no knowledge of the > > netgraph spinlocks. > > so how is it supposed to know? From what I can gather, you add the locking hierarchy to be enforced to spin_order_list in kern.mutex.c Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6lja7Wry0BWjoQKURAt1JAKDOgOLIyjKstBtnO+q7ACGOtkL9zgCeJxJ2 jW12B+9AZpZSz49CYigJkUQ= =obGE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010223020859.A4771>