Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:05:45 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Joao Barros <joao.barros@gmail.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile sensorsd.conf src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d Makefile sensorsd src/lib/libc/gen sysctl.3 src/sbin/sysctl sysctl.8 sysctl.c src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 src/share/man/man9 Makefile sensor_attach.9 src/sys/conf f Message-ID: <47165D09.7040909@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4713A871.1080608@errno.com> References: <70e8236f0710150343k590f5be8r8cdf3fd60df4abd2@mail.gmail.com> <4713700D.8040202@samsco.org> <20071015193658.138fc9a5@deskjail> <4713A871.1080608@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sam Leffler wrote: > Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Quoting Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> (Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:50:05 -0600): keep in mind htere are a lot of people out here that have no opinion as we haven't looked at it in detail, who may like the idea of a sensor framework but don't know enough about this implementation to chime in. I've seen 4 people who say they don't like it, and 3 or 4 (I wasn't counting) who said that they either liked it or at least didn't see anything wrong with it. SO it's not a clear cut as it may appear. Having spent some time in past lives supporting various sensors, I know that there is a crying need for some sort of framework but that doesn't mean that it needs to be this one, or even in the kernel. Maybe we can find someone to arbitrate. We used to have an architecture board for this purpose but we got rid of it. >>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47165D09.7040909>