Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 17:38:12 -0400 From: Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com> To: 'Doug White' <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: y2k compliance version Message-ID: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB44011058A6@site2s1>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Does that imply that 2.2.8 isn't y2k compliant? I thought that 2.2.8 was still going to be supported for "critical updates" -Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug White [SMTP:dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 4:58 PM > To: Kenneth Woo > Cc: 'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG' > Subject: Re: y2k compliance version > > On Tue, 11 May 1999, Kenneth Woo wrote: > > > This message bounced for the bugs address. Could you forward or > > answer the question? > > > > ---------- > > From: Kenneth Woo > > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 12:51 PM > > To: 'freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG' > > > > I have been reading you statement for the y2k compliance, the question > > that I have is, which version of FreeBSD has all the fixes > > incorporated? > > They should be in 3.1 and later. > > Doug White > Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve > http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB44011058A6>