Date: Tue, 21 Feb 1995 14:53:55 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Possible kern.maxproc fatal bug Message-ID: <9502211953.AA06021@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199502211152.DAA00893@corbin.Root.COM> References: <199502210818.TAA10312@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <199502211152.DAA00893@corbin.Root.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 21 Feb 1995 03:51:57 -0800, David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> said: > whatever "maxproc" was at startup time. Other than creating a "balance set", > there really isn't any way of working around this problem other than making > the map much large than maxproc (and thus allow maxproc to grow much larger). > Perhaps making the map accomodate 2 or 3 times maxproc might be a compromise. This sounds like a good idea. Of course, sysctl should be modified as well to understand that there actually is a hard upper limit to the hard upper limit :-) . -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9502211953.AA06021>