Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:48:06 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Maxim.Sobolev@portaone.com Cc: Pertti Kosunen <pertti.kosunen@pp.nic.fi>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Yuriy N. Shkandybin" <jura@networks.ru>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Timers and timing, was: MySQL Performance 6.0rc1 Message-ID: <37735.1130572086@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:29:10 PDT." <436324C6.5040107@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <436324C6.5040107@portaone.com>, Maxim Sobolev writes: >> I'm not sure I see much difference between a shared library and this >> solution, but I'm equally sure we'd love to se a prototype before >> we judge it :-) > >Difference is that you won't have additional problems with userland and >kernel versions mismatch and don't need any additional complexity >associated with versioning/fallback logic. So why don't we implement all the syscalls this way if we have to go down that route anyway ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37735.1130572086>