Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:05:11 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org, jvarner@gmail.com Subject: Re: Future of CTM Message-ID: <201509111405.t8BE5BxE008774@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:19:28 -0700." <2133149.u1BgRHIO00@overcee.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> > Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:19:28 -0700 > I have been trying to find an example of somebody who is actually verifying > signatures before piping the messages to to ctm_rmail. Even the procmailrc > files that you publish at http://www.berklix.com/jhs/txt/ctms.html don't do > signature checking. From your own pages: > # JJLATER add a check for pgp signature, ref. Thanks to the procmail sample from jvarner, I now apply GPG to all my incoming CTM streams. Later I may move gpg verify from procmail to shells, per new comments marked JJLATER in: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/dots/.procmailrc.lists http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/local/mail/ctm-freebsd-svn-incoming Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Reply after previous text, like a play - Not before, which looses context. Indent previous text with "> " Insert new lines before 80 chars. Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not ms.doc, Not base64.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201509111405.t8BE5BxE008774>