Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 May 2015 08:58:26 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To:        =?UTF-8?B?R3VzdGF1IFDDqXJleg==?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu>, FreeBSD XEN <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Porting the block-iscsi hotplug script
Message-ID:  <55602512.1090702@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <555F9B3F.1000600@entel.upc.edu>
References:  <553DEB97.5000300@entel.upc.edu> <5540A053.4080409@entel.upc.edu> <5540F3FC.80606@citrix.com> <5541FC8A.8080009@citrix.com> <5542365D.10403@entel.upc.edu> <55423ECD.6000404@citrix.com> <5556F21D.2050005@entel.upc.edu> <555EEFBA.5080902@citrix.com> <555EF542.3090002@citrix.com> <555F9B3F.1000600@entel.upc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,

El 22/05/15 a les 23.10, Gustau PĂ©rez ha escrit:
>    I'll take a look at those patches. I'm not sure if I'll be able to
> test them this weekend.

No problem, I've already sent the patches upstream for review but I will
make sure you can properly test them before they are committed.

>    My current kernel is a bit old (r281759 as of April 21th), and I'm
> currently using the
> 0001-xen-introduce-a-newbus-function-to-allocate-unused-m.patch. Has
> this patch been integrated in HEAD?

Yes, a proper fix for this issue was committed as r282634:

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=282634

>    I'm considering rebuild everything and then try your patches.
> 
>    Thanks for your efforts,

Thanks for the testing, Roger.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55602512.1090702>