Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:05:06 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Pertti Kosunen <pertti.kosunen@pp.nic.fi>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Yuriy N. Shkandybin" <jura@networks.ru>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Timers and timing, was: MySQL Performance 6.0rc1 Message-ID: <43632D32.6000300@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <37735.1130572086@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <37735.1130572086@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <436324C6.5040107@portaone.com>, Maxim Sobolev writes: > > >>>I'm not sure I see much difference between a shared library and this >>>solution, but I'm equally sure we'd love to se a prototype before >>>we judge it :-) >> >>Difference is that you won't have additional problems with userland and >>kernel versions mismatch and don't need any additional complexity >>associated with versioning/fallback logic. > > > So why don't we implement all the syscalls this way if we have to go > down that route anyway ? This is what I am suggesting actually. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43632D32.6000300>