Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:27:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227862] devel/py-tox: update to 3.0.0 Message-ID: <bug-227862-21822-Fno5OyX8QK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-227862-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-227862-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227862 Kai <freebsd_ports@k-worx.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #194231| |maintainer-approval?(koobs@ Flags| |FreeBSD.org) --- Comment #6 from Kai <freebsd_ports@k-worx.org> --- Created attachment 194231 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D194231&action= =3Dedit py-tox-3.0.0-DOCS.patch (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #5) Thank you for the detailed explanations and insights. I really appreciate t= hat. Attached is a rebased patch with the DOCS option. The builds are fine so far and with the DOCS option enabled, there are 7 warnings (related to devel/py-pluggy + devel/py-py) during the build.l The test results are: With Python 2.7: > 368 passed, 4 skipped, 1 xfailed (due a bug as noted in the results) in 4= 5.71 seconds With Python 3.6: > 369 passed, 3 skipped, 1 xfailed (due a bug as noted in the result) in 57= .34 seconds If the problems with the packages "packaging" and "simple" still persist in some way it would be no problem for me to leave the port at its current sta= te without the DOCS option. (Although it's always quite handy to have some reference if you're travelling or your ISP let you down.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227862-21822-Fno5OyX8QK>