Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:40:52 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com> To: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD for Linux users Message-ID: <20031201214052.GY90713@seekingfire.com> In-Reply-To: <3FCBADA3.8070909@potentialtech.com> References: <20031126232537.24176.qmail@web13704.mail.yahoo.com> <20031126234313.GZ90881@submonkey.net> <3FC53E21.9020709@potentialtech.com> <u2sr7zo8d7a.fsf@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu> <3FCBADA3.8070909@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 04:07:47PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> >The location of the config directory isn't the only thing that looks
> >strange to them. The linux executables, as well, traditionally go in /bin
> >(or /sbin). It seems that someone migrating from linux would find it more
> >familiar to have ports' PREFIX set to / (instead of /usr/local). The
> >disadvantages are: 1. risk of filling the / slice (which is typically very
> >small on FreeBSD and very big on most linux distros). 2. a port file
> >overrunning a same-named file in the base system. Some people find it
> >easier to keep these two things in mind than to get used to the idea of
> >/usr/local.
>
> In my experience, I haven't seen anyone have trouble with this, I would
> assume the reason is that they seldom need to know where the binaries are.
> As long as their path looks for them, they'll run and nobody's the wiser.
Additionally, the the FHS specifies "/opt" for this purpose. It's likely
either an older distribution or a distribution that follows RedHat in
ignoring /opt if one sees /bin being uses.
And /opt maps nicely to /usr/local in concept.
-T
--
A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!"
"However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me
a sense of obligation."
- Stephen Crane
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031201214052.GY90713>