Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:05:47 +0800
From:      "Intron" <mag@intron.ac>
To:        Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
Cc:        alexander@leidinger.net, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   [Updated on 2006-07-29] Re: My Linux AIO Implementation Calling for Test
Message-ID:  <1154167741.55639@origin.intron.ac>
In-Reply-To: <20060728093647.GA32168@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
References:  <1153994127.11460@origin.intron.ac> <20060728093647.GA32168@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Download: http://ftp.intron.ac/tmp/linux_aio-20060729.tar.bz2

1. Use LMSG().
2. I wonder whether ARGS() is handy enough. Instead, the keyword __func__
    instituted by ISO C99 should be used. See my DARGPRINTF().
3. Some modifications for style(9).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                From Beijing, China

Divacky Roman wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:44:01PM +0800, Intron wrote:
>> Download: http://ftp.intron.ac/tmp/linux_aio-20060727.tar.bz2
>> 
>> Based on FreeBSD aio(4), my patch set has implemented 5 system calls
>> of Linux Asynchronous Input/Output: io_setup(2), io_destroy(2),
>> io_getevents(2), io_submit(2) and io_cancel(2). It only works with
>> 7.0-CURRENT.
> 
> havent studied details but here are my suggestions:
> 
> 1) please conform to style(9)
> 
> 2) please use LMSG, ARGS macros to be conform with the rest of the linuxolator
> 
> 3) why do you use uma directly? linuxolator uses malloc from within M_LINUX. I
> personally dont mind using uma zone directly but if there is a reason for it.
> 
> thnx for your contribution!
> 
> roman




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1154167741.55639>