Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:32:35 -0500 From: "Will Saxon" <WillS@housing.ufl.edu> To: "Mike B" <meb@cinci.rr.com>, <conrads@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: I like SCHED_4BSD Message-ID: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867FD@bragi.housing.ufl.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I couldn't agree more. After doing the suggested mappings in > libmap.conf > and recompiling apps I can see a drastic difference in load times and > performance between ULE and 4BSD. Using ULE the load wait for firefox > could be anywhere from 10-30 seconds while with 4BSD it is a > constant 4 > second load time. When switching between desktops it can take > up to 10 > seconds to redraw the screen. This sluggishness isn't exclusive to > firefox, opera and openoffice are noticeably laggy under ULE > as well. I > WANT to like and use ULE but the performance just isn't there. I am not experiencing this with firefox. It takes 2-3 seconds to load. I am also not experiencing issues with screen redraws. I am using a Feb 14th -current with _ULE. firefox-bin is linked against libpthread. Old, I know, but maybe it can help narrow down a timeframe where changes have caused problems? -Will
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867FD>