Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:52:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kern/681110 re-roll of RFC3522 (Eifel detection) patchset Message-ID: <20070412095035.N77693@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <461DFB2B.10106@delphij.net> References: <461D921E.5040206@delphij.net> <20070412005137.A77693@odysseus.silby.com> <461DF0A2.5090304@FreeBSD.org> <461DFB2B.10106@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, LI Xin wrote: > That's disappointing, but better safe than sorry. > > BTW. Is there any legal alternative, e.g. make this as an option like > WANT_IDEA? That sounds like an option... but is it worth it? Can you give us access to your testbench that shows eifel to be an important improvement over the current eifel-less stack we have right now? My guess is that SACK nullified most of eifel's importance. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070412095035.N77693>