Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:05:13 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/gnu/lib Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Message-ID: <20020515150513.A14077@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200205151629.g4FGTj062213@freefall.freebsd.org>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:29:45AM -0700 References: <200205151629.g4FGTj062213@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:29:45AM -0700, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> ru 2002/05/15 09:29:45 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> . Makefile.inc1
> gnu/lib Makefile
> gnu/usr.bin Makefile
> gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile
> Log:
> Make sure to not yet build the GNU C++, but still allow
> for the C++ progs to be built with e.g. an old compiler,
> CXX=/usr/bin/c++, for the time being.
Please back this out. You are removing the ability to use an external
C++ compiler.
Setting CXX=/usr/bin/c++ is bad advice -- if it was usable we would not
be in the situation we are in now.
I envision users to set CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++31, as that is the C++
compiler Ports now uses. The only gotcha is needing to have gperf
already installed on a system. Would you be able to add a test for the
existance of gperf before trying to build src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus?
It would have to test for the existance of /usr/bin/gperf (for older
systems that have this from Gcc 2.95 days; and
${.OBJDIR}/<somehwere>/gperf for the CXX=g++31 case).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020515150513.A14077>