Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 02:33:53 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, mike@smith.net.au Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, jc@irbs.com, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dog Sloooow SMP Message-ID: <199811301533.CAA00461@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >No idea. I've received verification that fixing this for all 686-class >> >CPUs seems to work (ie. it's OK on the Cyrix MII and doesn't appear to >> >impact performance there), so the tests are now generalised for the >> >entire 686-class. >> >> It's only OK for MII's because of various `#if 0's and `#ifdef SMP's >> that prevent non-OK code from running on MII's. > >Care to comment on which operations aren't OK? I did ask for this in >the review phase, with no feedback. Most wrmsr()s and rdmsr()s. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811301533.CAA00461>