Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:38:41 -0800 From: Mark Foster <mark@foster.cc> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stable vs Release vs Current Message-ID: <20040218213841.GA70192@riddler.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <web-238362961@mail01.infosat.net> References: <web-238362961@mail01.infosat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:35:20PM +0200, David Beukes wrote: [snip] > Am now running 4.9 and started cvsupping the source. my > supfile has this line in it: default release=3Dcvs > tag=3DRELENG_4_9. Am I wasting my time? Should it rather read > RELENG_4? If so, why? If you want to track the security branch for RELEASE 4.9 use RELENG_4_9 Otherwise use RELENG_4 which means tracking STABLE. =20 > And where do security patches fit into this story?=20 See above. =20 > Any info would be helpful. Go read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/article.html Then if you still have questions, ask again. --=20 Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints... Mark Foster <mark@foster.cc> http://mark.foster.cc/ --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAM9thsP1x4ZySqYcRAkONAJ9IZyfZZWOtG1equTQr/vdIi3bLpACeMytb wXa6kfxSzkC7vHSBMG7wEto= =oBJu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040218213841.GA70192>