Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:49:35 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 Message-ID: <43B2B358-75C9-4D40-A48B-450A0CA4D8F3@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVfanU=FVWPd768_G5NjXRHnUH5o05%2BKwFeLaTQqU3Ux8w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG=rPVct-HzOksM2KQvPuOdf4zgZo__=Oannh0x%2B_JVHEzQyyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVfkGa7=n-TSqcnP574ry0Au2THbqvAZJfKD5OK9a1FBNw@mail.gmail.com> <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> <CAG=rPVeBgWS=vMGxSmX8O4QWW77XC2mqDgaiNrFsGrzg47UQYQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140617211436.GI1248@hub.FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVezMsPCP%2BB1ePw_Mh=Cv6qx07ordsWQ3cF4a_ytLWeCEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVd4evnkJoz1rVeMjP7YNKOW0BWF0MvSrFQ3u2xCiVEtmw@mail.gmail.com> <690CE378-D7D9-49A6-BC20-13FD540E63A2@FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVfanU=FVWPd768_G5NjXRHnUH5o05%2BKwFeLaTQqU3Ux8w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, >> unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which >> was *not* redundant. :-/ > > > Warner, > > Is there a way to bring back the behavior of r257658 but without > the way it was implemented with the EARLY_BUILD flag? > It would be handy, as we can see by this thread discussion. The EARLY_BUILD flag tightly coupled the bsd.*.mk files to the build system, so I’l like to see it stay dead. 9.x assumes that by defining it, it can affect the system installed .mk files in a specific way. This is an unwise assumption, as this thread demonstrates. The real problem, imho, is that the construct in bsd.prog.mk is generating a dependency on the wrong C++ standard library. Why is it generating for the g++ library when the compiler is clang? That seems like the real bug here. I’ll also note that building release X-2 on head isn’t generally supported by the project, but having said that, I’ll see what I can do. Surprisingly, I don’t have a good -current environment setup on my fast build boxes, so I’ll setup a quick jail and see if I can recreate. Warner [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTomvfAAoJEGwc0Sh9sBEAJgQP/2pG4E/88QlUFIw/VwNbY3o/ 9Gcy3hH7GGw+wVMhu3uL+vdtMbh7IfhOLB7EZMK2rXo02AMudj8AtVz3ZHsfPfyU 6RvgGFO+GCtcSQ7TQbguHuJ90l+A1qnW8JdiSy4478Atw6YXyZH2ZQo+Uj5BFXzX IxCXnh0fk3FRgXPkgPOag8ZM3IC5SyOPGbF0gGP0KZ7RTuo0rhgUsHSToK9cXMiX NFv9RZGUF4H7tOqqXCPP7JkPzW85/3PJ2hBOUVRDgIG353Ret7Ap7NYQrEO89Y5Z UKEYUqxdapyWG0BhtkF+Yd7rGEs3zoFNXAMqSd0sivw0o8LxJDCNYcinKT59yZfG ZbjjWHX0JzXBkoLEplyN0kO7lL0DQgRUJp2Xb/FrfuTzH+5RQlP90zohqr+Beudl oNi2TL8O/HpsqUwszfXOT/qrSYCif/iBzPofkpi79qbyvJp0EvmV4a4ek8srXDmb +vLWVHtFg/ktSe7SPIYT/xp0+xLfd/rtDTWrz7LzAYBJlZp3nepFcfLZ6Jidwoff K/ANFdRTa7RN400mnI0Nu9wptajASjgSkazmHoPsoJvMZinB+YJEZW9H9FAlz5JC xltjdb1VHzpREoBCJlaxwS2KMmnpuZ8QNhuDuZ1+Ez6zfkx7J6fZOcoz7o2N+DJC Ib62mMSe6rLVUx9GsXVz =l9Fg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43B2B358-75C9-4D40-A48B-450A0CA4D8F3>