Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:56:21 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>, Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues? Message-ID: <CAPyFy2DSu1A9UcFAKqXOS9aF_U9MV5iFJ0aFsgVbCep7rwQzWg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BhQ2%2Bj3%2BnMBMBRiA7P4DOBNubd4w%2BH%2B_k-U9=vCfZLsZYdsLQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <0650CA79-5711-44BF-AC3F-0C5C5B6E5BD9@rdsor.ro> <5648C964.2020405@freebsd.org> <2DF061E9-2541-4B10-9744-C49C515FF672@gmail.com> <5648CBA1.9010300@freebsd.org> <20151118193252.GE27296@e-new.0x20.net> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bj3%2BnMBMBRiA7P4DOBNubd4w%2BH%2B_k-U9=vCfZLsZYdsLQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 November 2015 at 15:46, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > i was going to suggest doing ldd on the binaries or a grep on the > Makefile but the latter returns a surprisingly low number > of matches. That's because it's usually added via LIBADD=xo. My grep turns up these: bin/df, bin/ls, bin/ps, sbin/savecore, usr.bin/iscsictl, usr.bin/netstat, usr.bin/procstat, usr.bin/w, usr.bin/wc, usr.bin/xo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2DSu1A9UcFAKqXOS9aF_U9MV5iFJ0aFsgVbCep7rwQzWg>