Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:45:35 +0800
From:      David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: libkse*.a in 7.0
Message-ID:  <47536DCF.3040506@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0711281651360.24547@sea.ntplx.net>
References:  <20071128211022.GA74762@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>	<20071128213947.Q7555@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0711281651360.24547@sea.ntplx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote:

> 
> I argued for removing libc.a as well as lib<thread>.a a couple of
> years ago and was met with opposition, mostly because statically
> linked applications are faster.
> 
> I think we should remove libthr.a, libkse.a and libc.a, so flame on!
> 

Keep libc.a, and add my 1 cent for removing libthr.a, libkse.a. :-)





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47536DCF.3040506>