Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:14:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Joan Picanyol <lists-freebsd-current@biaix.org> Subject: Re: /usr/ports/UPDATING announcement (was: Re: Xorg built fails on CURRENT: can't find Xauth.h) Message-ID: <20040728151340.U61655@xeon.unixathome.org> In-Reply-To: <200407282108.11377.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20040727223701.07D1B5D08@ptavv.es.net> <200407282034.34549.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200407282108.11377.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 20:51, Dan Langille wrote: > > > Yep, and if it had been sent to freebsd-announce, many more people would > > have read about it. current@ and doc@ is insufficient. > > When I said "here", I didn't realise what lists I was posting to - it had been > announced on ports (and since then mentioned there many times). OK. ports@ is also insufficient. To expect all users of the ports tree to track ports@ is unreasonable. A post to announce@ is still justified. IMHO. -- Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040728151340.U61655>