Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 01 Jul 2023 04:20:36 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 270835] x11/sddm: No shutdown and reboot buttons without sysutils/consolekit2
Message-ID:  <bug-270835-9-vPiUOagqCd@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-270835-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-270835-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270835

Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |maintainer-feedback?(deskto
                   |                            |p@FreeBSD.org)
                 CC|                            |desktop@FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |doc@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #8 from Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@freebsd.org> ---
desktop@ (sysutils/consolekit2)=20
kde@ (x11/sddm)

Re: <https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/consolekit2/#requiredby>;

Should consolekit2 additionally become a requirement for x11/sddm?

    <https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11/sddm/Makefile>;

Or, should we solely (without the requirement) document the benefits of
consolekit2 in contexts such as SDDM?

The FreeBSD Handbook does not yet mention consolekit2.=20

<https://www.freshports.org/x11/sddm/#message>; will benefit from a mention.=
=20

----

For what it's worth: I lean towards requirement, however I can not estimate
whether it would spark a chorus of disapproval.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-270835-9-vPiUOagqCd>