Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2023 04:20:36 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 270835] x11/sddm: No shutdown and reboot buttons without sysutils/consolekit2 Message-ID: <bug-270835-9-vPiUOagqCd@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-270835-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-270835-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270835 Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(deskto | |p@FreeBSD.org) CC| |desktop@FreeBSD.org, | |doc@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #8 from Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@freebsd.org> --- desktop@ (sysutils/consolekit2)=20 kde@ (x11/sddm) Re: <https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/consolekit2/#requiredby> Should consolekit2 additionally become a requirement for x11/sddm? <https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11/sddm/Makefile> Or, should we solely (without the requirement) document the benefits of consolekit2 in contexts such as SDDM? The FreeBSD Handbook does not yet mention consolekit2.=20 <https://www.freshports.org/x11/sddm/#message> will benefit from a mention.= =20 ---- For what it's worth: I lean towards requirement, however I can not estimate whether it would spark a chorus of disapproval. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-270835-9-vPiUOagqCd>