Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:36:34 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: Joan Picanyol <lists-freebsd-current@biaix.org> Subject: Re: /usr/ports/UPDATING announcement (was: Re: Xorg built fails on CURRENT: can't find Xauth.h) Message-ID: <200407282136.34894.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040728151340.U61655@xeon.unixathome.org> References: <20040727223701.07D1B5D08@ptavv.es.net> <200407282108.11377.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20040728151340.U61655@xeon.unixathome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_CBACBEOy3+b9Mlr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 28 July 2004 21:14, Dan Langille wrote: > OK. ports@ is also insufficient. To expect all users of the ports tree to > track ports@ is unreasonable. A post to announce@ is still justified. > IMHO. Certainly. Write a up an announcement, send it to freebsd-announce@ and let= =20 the moderation pass it on. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_CBACBEOy3+b9Mlr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBCABCXhc68WspdLARAsOxAJ9jezURFnS5eGpWR1SlVJuLkYSLdwCffCuE 1h+VxH7n0d112vqdAfe3vUg= =cYmd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_CBACBEOy3+b9Mlr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407282136.34894.michaelnottebrock>