Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:47:20 -0700 From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <4FE35E28.6000808@queernet.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211933560.9208@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120621015237.GB58187@neutralgood.org> <AC6A916E-066B-4399-89E1-90C2394327E7@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4FE35208.40708@queernet.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211907470.4170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE35616.9080304@queernet.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211916060.4170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <op.wf9j6hw834t2sn@tech304> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211930300.5130@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <op.wf9keepj34t2sn@tech304> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211933560.9208@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/21/12 10:36 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> >>> sources please! >> >> Google "GPLv3 court case". There are no applicable results. Until a >> Judge decides what the license truly means everyone using it is at risk. > > true. > > But why anyone from FreeBSD fundation didn't just write official > letter to GNU "Free" Software Foundation asking for just that case? Because what FSF says is irrelevant. What courts decide is all that counts.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE35E28.6000808>