Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:30:14 GMT From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/90851: mdoc(7) manpage needs more FreeBSD versions Message-ID: <200601021730.k02HUElT061545@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/90851; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, remko@FreeBSD.org, phk@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/90851: mdoc(7) manpage needs more FreeBSD versions Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:23:53 +0000 On 1 Jan 2006, at 23:00, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20060101194413.GA73743@elvandar.org>, Remko Lodder > writes: >> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:34:42PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>>> Description: >>> >>> The mdoc(7) manual enumerates (pointlessly in my opinion) the >>> various releases >>> of FreeBSD that can be specified to the Os and Fx macros: >>> >>> FreeBSD 1.0, 1.1, 1.1.5, 1.1.5.1, 2.0, 2.0.5, >>> 2.1, 2.1.5, >>> 2.1.6, 2.1.7, 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, >>> 2.2.5, 2.2.6, >>> 2.2.7, 2.2.8, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, >>> 3.4, 3.5, 4.0, >>> 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, >>> 4.6.2, 4.7, >>> 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.2.1, >>> 5.3 >>> >>> The list should either be kept up to date, or more sensibly be >>> replaced with >>> >>> FreeBSD 1.0, 1.1, 1.1.5, 2.0, 2.0.5, etc. etc. >>> >>> >> >> Hi Poul-Henning, >> >> Does the diff below look reasonable? > > Is it a more future proof solution to just list a handful and add > "etc" ? We should ask Ruslan whether we can rely on them all being supported. Ceri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601021730.k02HUElT061545>