Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:32:39 GMT From: "G. Paul Ziemba" <p-fbsd-bugs@ziemba.us> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: docs/144127: termios(4) man page wrongly claims CCTS_OFLOW/CRTSCTS is unused Message-ID: <201002200932.o1K9WdNx035748@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201002200940.o1K9e19I088966@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
>Number: 144127
>Category: docs
>Synopsis: termios(4) man page wrongly claims CCTS_OFLOW/CRTSCTS is unused
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-doc
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Sat Feb 20 09:40:01 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: G. Paul Ziemba
>Release: 8.X
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD foo.ziemba.us 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #2: Fri Dec 11 16:36:37 PST 2009 root@hairball:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GPZ-091127 i386
>Description:
termios(4) says:
"The CCTS_OFLOW (CRTSCTS) flag is currently unused."
Yet code in /usr/src/sys/dev/uart/uart_tty.c references CCTS_OFLOW and as far as I know, it works. Hasn't it worked forever?
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Proposed replacement text:
If CCTS_OFLOW (CRTSCTS) is set, transmission is stopped when CTS is lowered and resumed when CTS is raised.
Maybe similar treatment is warranted for CRTS_IFLOW?
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201002200932.o1K9WdNx035748>