Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:53:41 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ldconfig when PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES (and linux ports) Message-ID: <88563594@bsam.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070806095553.l75rul9eok0kw004@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Mon\, 06 Aug 2007 09\:55\:53 %2B0200") References: <52921778@bsam.ru> <1186178328.46188.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <86849396@bsam.ru> <20070806095553.l75rul9eok0kw004@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:55:53 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Sat, 04 Aug 2007 02:09:47 +04= 00): > [CCing emulation@...] > > On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:58:47 +0200 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >> Boris Samorodov p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v so 04. 08. 2007 v 01:30 +0400: > > > >> > Seems that running ldconfig while building a package at package > >> > cluster (i.e. when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined) is quite useless. [1] > >> > > >> > To be more specific I'm interested at linux ports. ATM we run linux > >> > ldconfig (using linuxulator) _at package building_. Hence to create a > >> > package for FC6 port we should change compat.linux.osrelease (which I > >> > don't like and try to avoid). If the "ldconfig" stage may be skipped > >> > when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined then things get way too easier both > >> > for default kernel linux.osrelease and default linux_base port chang= e. > > > >> I don't follow - what is the problem? > > > > An FC6 port can't be build (and more specific -- linux-fc6 ldconfig > > doesn't run) with current default compat.linux.osrelease=3D2.4.2. So > > this sysctl should be changed to 2.6.16 for package building sake. > > When the default compat.linux.osrelease will be switched to 2.6.16 we > > will get the other way round problem if we try to build and FC4 port. > > > > I don't like the status quo and want to find a way to siplify it. > It's not only a ldconfig problem, it's a generic problem. The gtk > ports run plugin detection programs (gtk-query-immodules-2.0-32 and > gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders-32) at installation time. Sure you are right. If we can solve this problem soon -- that will be great. > Do you think it is a problem when the non-default linux port is not > available as a package? No, the problem is in ability to run a linux binary. > Currently I don't think it is a big problem > (you can check the value of the sysctl and IGNORE if it is not ok). Agreed. WBR --=20 bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88563594>