Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 10 Dec 2017 12:54:58 -0800
From:      Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
To:        Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, Igor Mozolevsky <mozolevsky@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd security <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
Subject:   Re: http subversion URLs should be discontinued in favor of https URLs
Message-ID:  <2fde7b1e-7174-00d1-5fd0-65c385bdcdef@rawbw.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A2D9CEF.9020404@grosbein.net>
References:  <97f76231-dace-10c4-cab2-08e5e0d792b5@rawbw.com> <5A2709F6.8030106@grosbein.net> <11532fe7-024d-ba14-0daf-b97282265ec6@rawbw.com> <8788fb0d-4ee9-968a-1e33-e3bd84ffb892@heuristicsystems.com.au> <20171205220849.GH9701@gmail.com> <20171205231845.5028d01d@gumby.homeunix.com> <CADWvR2gVn8H5h6LYB5ddwUHYwDtiLCuYndsXhJywi7Q9vNsYvw@mail.gmail.com> <20171210173222.GF5901@funkthat.com> <CADWvR2iGQOtcU=FnU-fNsso2eLCCQn=swnOLoqws%2B33V8VzX1Q@mail.gmail.com> <5c810101-9092-7665-d623-275c15d4612b@rawbw.com> <CADWvR2j_LLEPKnSynRRmP4LG3mypdkNitwg%2B7vSh=iuJ=JU09Q@mail.gmail.com> <fd888f6b-bf16-f029-06d3-9a9b754dc676@rawbw.com> <CADWvR2jnxVwXmTA9XpZhGYnCAhFVifqqx2MvYeSeHmYEybaNnA@mail.gmail.com> <19bd6d57-4fa6-24d4-6262-37e1487d7ed6@rawbw.com> <5A2D8CDF.80903@grosbein.net> <f374ad86-f69c-115d-60f0-5251fba4b6d6@rawbw.com> <5A2D9CEF.9020404@grosbein.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/10/17 12:45, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 11.12.2017 3:37, Yuri wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/17 11:37, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>> Hmm, you should not pass your traffic through the network operated
>>> by lots of malicious operators in first place. No matter encrypted or not.
>>> There are plenty of alternative ways.
>>
>> Modern encryption protocols allow you to send traffic over insecure networks and still maintain your security and privacy, so why not?
> No, they don't. You get into MITM and then you have a choice: ignore and run your connection anyway
> or have no connectivity at all (using this channel). Both are bad, so don't use such a channel from the beginning.

There's no MITMing with https unless you are a state actor. There are 
very few state actors, they are special case.
Regular hackers can't MITM https, but can MITM http.

Yuri



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2fde7b1e-7174-00d1-5fd0-65c385bdcdef>