Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 04:14:18 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), jb@cimlogic.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: binutils bloat Message-ID: <199803141214.EAA07122@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 14 Mar 1998 12:41:48 %2B0100." <199803141141.MAA16622@sos.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who wrote: > > > If we are going to have crosstarget development tools, it should be > > > completely optional, preferably a port. > > > > Ports are actually a really nasty solution for anything that might > > involve building an eventual release, trust me! Just breaking out the > > SGML stuff for docs was painful enough, and that was exceedingly > > peripheral. > > You mean you would build all the different machine releases on ONE > platform ??? That will be quite a task :) You really do want to put that P6 I just shipped to you to good use. Building releases for everything we have that's releasable is getting pretty boring. By the time we're ready to release for Alpha and Sparc, we're going to *want* a challenge. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803141214.EAA07122>