Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 21:46:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fortran@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246888] catch Mk/Uses/fortran.mk up to bsd.gcc.mk r301878 Message-ID: <bug-246888-37611-IWaOw6XmSg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-246888-37611@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-246888-37611@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246888 --- Comment #2 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Mark Linimon from comment #0) > In order to test 246700, fortran.mk needs to catch up to changes > long-ago made to bsd.gcc.mk. > > The general problem is that bsd.gcc.mk cannot handle the idea of "gccX-de= vel", > as bsd.gcc.mk was taught to. First, thanks for catching this, Mark! Second, I was going to use this for an -exp run for the update to GCC 10 before GCC 10.1 was released and hence lang/gcc10 created.=20 In the meantime GCC 10.1 is out and I suggest that I focus on getting the lang/gcc10 port in place quickly (=3D tomorrow) and we can then use that for the -exp run. If I am right, this means this present issue goes away and we can close this report - and save you time and us code duplication in Uses/fortran.mk? Makes sense? Agreed? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246888-37611-IWaOw6XmSg>