Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:30:25 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Luo Hong <luohong99@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PLEASE TEST: acpi pci irq routing Message-ID: <411A49A1.4070504@root.org> In-Reply-To: <292208319.23518@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> References: <41131EEC.4050909@root.org> <291946042.22742@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> <292099916.02624@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> <292119349.27842@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> <292159260.15722@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> <292208319.23518@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luo Hong wrote: > Nate Lawson wrote: > >> Thanks for the dmesg. My work completely revamps the IRQ routing and >> no longer is dependent on the status (_STA) as the PR indicates. >> >> I found two problems your testing revealed, fixed them, then made this >> patch. Please revert the old patch, apply this one, and test. Your >> system has a LOT of PRT entries. :) >> >> -Nate > > > Thanks very much. The PS/2 mouse can work well with the new patch. But I > still include the new dmesg from boot -v and the acpi asl, > you can check if all things are good. I don't know why there are too > lots of PRT entries and whether it is good or bad. > I think the patch could be committed now, and really thanks for your > hard work:) You're welcome. Your dmesg shows that the updated algorithm works as expected. I've committed the patch. FYI, your machine has entries for 38 PCI slots (including embedded devices). :) -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?411A49A1.4070504>