Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 00:37:01 -0500 From: Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>, Anuranjan Shukla <anshukla@juniper.net>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org>, "freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Arch" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Roadmap for ifnet(9) for FreeBSD 11 Message-ID: <201405290537.s4T5b16Z033344@mail.karels.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 29 May 2014 08:04:25 %2B0400. <20140529040425.GT50679@glebius.int.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcel and others, is there more to the roadmap than making the ifnet easier to change? Could you outline a bit more of the roadmap? I know that Juniper has more levels in the hierarchy of interface data structures. What are you proposing that we change after this step? I'll also repeat the general part of Rui's question: R> This is indeed needed, but it would be nice to understand what would happen if the community has comments about your patch. Will Juniper be able to integrate back those comments? Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201405290537.s4T5b16Z033344>