Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:36:09 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/gobject-introspection - has semi-fluid pkg-plist contents Message-ID: <1274754969.95620.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilwvQy-6ozINBUz7Wx6T73sv7-rwJzLOw1EGOVN@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTilwvQy-6ozINBUz7Wx6T73sv7-rwJzLOw1EGOVN@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-tviJ9nNKcFlYKYesPItH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 02:40 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hi Gnome folks, > I recently tried to run make package-recursive on > editors/openoffice.org-3 for some testing and I unfortunately got hung > up on making a package out of devel/gobject-introspection. One of the > bits (the xrandr stuff) appeared to be dynamically compiled based on > the automake stuff that I saw (since my chroot didn't have xrandr > installed), but I figured that I should consult the experts first. > Are all of the optional packages being properly addressed in > pkg-plist? If not, then I have a starter patch to work with, but I'd > need some guidance as to what all needs to be done to detect potential > issues with conditionally installed bits. As far as I know there are no known packaging problems with gobject-introspection. Everything should be getting installed properly. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-tviJ9nNKcFlYKYesPItH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkv7N5YACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4e4bwCdFBfe1Oan4LWETiO7PLFkSDTh RqAAoI9pGQw5LGsQi5G+Cizzo3dhnwoU =Cdo0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tviJ9nNKcFlYKYesPItH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1274754969.95620.7.camel>