Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 17:02:48 -0800 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Kim Culhan <kimc@w8hd.org> Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New meteor driver Message-ID: <199603030102.RAA04166@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Mar 1996 19:53:44 EST." <Pine.BSF.3.91.960302195203.2922B-100000@moonpie.w8hd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, stick with the GUS MAX till I get a chance to get home I am at
work right now.
I will be happy to post the instructions on how to get the GUS PnP
working in a couple of hours however not right now 8)
Cheers,
Amancio
>>> Kim Culhan said:
>
>
> On Sat, 2 Mar 1996, Amancio Hasty Jr. wrote:
>
> > >>> Kim Culhan said:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2 Mar 1996, Amancio Hasty Jr. wrote:
> > >
> > > > >>> Kim Culhan said:
>
> > > The interruptions I'm hearing sound like 'static' not the relatively lo
nger
> > > time constant of the 'gating' action built into the half-duplex
> > > 'direction changer' which is level dependant. Is that what you were thi
nking
> > > of?
> >
> Well, I think is a lot easier to just built vat with the full duplex audio s
tuff
> > to find out if it eliminates the problem than to attempt to analyze the so
urce
> > of the problem.
>
> For sure.
>
> > Make sure that with the full duplex stuff :
> >
> > 1. you don't use vmix
> >
> > 2. For gus max only and *not* for the GUS PnP, ln -s /dev/audio1 /dev/audi
o:
> > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6 Mar 2 11:14 /dev/audio -> audio1
>
> I have obtained a PnP, should I go for it from the start?
>
> kim
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603030102.RAA04166>