Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:37:14 +0300 From: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: X11BASE still in use in ports Message-ID: <20120624123714.GA83824@ravenloft.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <4FE6F010.80609@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FE6F010.80609@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:46:40AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > I noticed a failure in one of my ports today while doing an upgrade, and > was embarrassed to find that it was due to my port still using X11BASE. > That led me to do a quick grep of the tree, which seems to indicate that > there are a non-zero number of uses of it which seem to be erroneous: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/x11base-ports.txt > > Note, some of these are actually Ok, I haven't made an attempt to filter > them out yet. > > Is there any interest in cleaning these up? Should we restore the > definition of X11BASE until all of the ports that are using it are fixed? > > I'm kind of surprised by this problem, since the usual way of removing > something like this is to make sure all of the consumers have been fixed > first. I have done a basic analysis. Ports that need to be fixed ('?' - not sure, '<D>' - should be deleted): http://people.freebsd.org/~ak/x11base.log -- Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120624123714.GA83824>