Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 06 Mar 1995 07:20:22 -0800
From:      David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
To:        starkhome!gene@sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu (Gene Stark)
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org, dyson@Root.COM
Subject:   Re: Page fault panics during make world in -current 
Message-ID:  <199503061520.HAA00590@corbin.Root.COM>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Mar 95 08:46:58 EST." <199503061346.IAA03940@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>In vfs_bio.c, line 758:
>
>	for (toff = 0; toff < vp->v_mount->mnt_stat.f_iosize; toff += tinc) {
>		int mask;
>
>-->		m = vm_page_lookup(obj, trunc_page(toff + off));
>		if (!m)
>			return 0;
>		if (vm_page_is_valid(m, toff + off, tinc) == 0)
>			return 0;
>	}
>
>The VM object obj is not locked, contrary to the comment preceding
>the definition of vm_page_lookup().  Potentially a problem?

   Object locking in uniprocessor systems is a NOP. If you look at the
definition of vm_object_lock, you'll see that it is defined as "simple_lock".
If you look at the definition of simple_lock, you'll see that it is nothing.
The missing object locks are an oversight...but not a problem.

-DG



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503061520.HAA00590>