Date: 27 Jun 2002 23:52:49 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "JP Villa (Datafull.com)" <root@datafull.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re[2]: openssh OR openssh-portable Message-ID: <xzpbs9wv172.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <41256714305.20020627163946@datafull.com> References: <3D1AD7C4.9020909@cerint.pl> <xzp6604x5ue.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <41256714305.20020627163946@datafull.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"JP Villa (Datafull.com)" <root@datafull.com> writes: > I think the original question was pointing to this too, > so I rephrase: openssh or openssh-portable? or maybe > openssh 3.4 properly merged on a production codebase? and > in that case, when? In my opinion, the latter is the best option, but it's your machine and your call. Jacques Vidrine has the final word in this matter, and I can't speak for him, but I expect 3.4 will hit -STABLE (and hopefully the security branches) sometime next week. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpbs9wv172.fsf>