Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 20:26:22 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Daniel Sobral" <Daniel_Sobral@voga.com.br> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nullfs & current UPDATE! Message-ID: <547.878066782@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 28 Oct 1997 15:02:15 -0300." <0325653E.00626440.00@papagaio.voga.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <0325653E.00626440.00@papagaio.voga.com.br>, "Daniel Sobral" writes: >> > + struct vnode *vp = ap->a_vp; >> > + struct null_node *xp = VTONULL(vp); >> > + struct vnode *lowervp = xp->null_lowervp; >I thought that kind of variable declaration was against style(9), and >likely to provoke anger among the smp-enlightened. I can't see why particular the smp-cursed should care, but the general sentiment on style(9) is that it lacks a implicit rule number zero: Stay in whatever style is in the file you modify. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?547.878066782>