Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 18:40:16 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <robert@cyrus.watson.org> To: Tim Baur <tbaur@esgroup.net> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/services Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980112183841.930C-100000@cyrus.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980112153607.15108A-100000@oblivion.esgroup.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Tim Baur wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Robert Watson wrote: > > > The reason for the #PROBLEMS! comment is that duplicate entries exist for > > those port numbers, so they (I assume) have been flagged as such for your > > reference. I have not checked the IANA page to see which is the > > legitimate one :). > > Uhm no. Both are needed as one is for tcp and the other for udp. I am aware that both are needed; I refer instead to the conflict between doom and mdqs. Here are the lines of interest from my services: % grep 666 /etc/services mdqs 666/tcp mdqs 666/udp doom 666/tcp #doom Id Software doom 666/udp #doom Id Software You will note that both mdqs and doom coexist on the same ports. One of these is presumably legitimate, allocated by IANA; the other is presumably not. I have not checked which is legitimate. Robert N Watson Carnegie Mellon University http://www.cmu.edu/ SafePort Network Services http://www.safeport.com/ robert@fledge.watson.org http://www.watson.org/~robert/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980112183841.930C-100000>