Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 13:32:27 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: rnordier@iafrica.com, bde@zeta.org.au, current@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: anyone working on upgrading the msdosfs to NetBSD levels? Message-ID: <199607302032.NAA00494@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <3900.838135055@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Jul 23, 96 05:17:35 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > DRIVE DOS START DOS END > > cyl head sect || cyl head sect cyl head sect size > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > >wd0 | 525 | 64 | 63 || 0 | 1 | 1 | 126 | 63 | 63 | 512001 > >wd0 | 2099 | 64 | 63 || 0 | 1 | 1 | 189 | 63 | 63 | 766017 > > same drive || 250 | 0 | 1 | 523 | 63 | 63 | 1104768 > >wd0 | 788 | 64 | 63 || 0 | 1 | 1 | 787 | 63 | 63 | 3177153 > >wd0 | 621 | 64 | 63 || 0 | 1 | 1 | 619 | 63 | 63 | 2499777 > > This could be because the drives in question have a version of then > "OnTrack" diskmanager that we don't recognize". I don't think so... there are several other vendors doing the same thing. One issue is that you would see only one partition on such a drive -- and the partition ID would identify the software to itself. Since there is more than one partition listed, this can't be the problem. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607302032.NAA00494>