Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:21:01 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 252984] qat(4): minor flaws
Message-ID:  <bug-252984-227-0wyLN7MmiZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-252984-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-252984-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D252984

Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org            |markj@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> ---
It's sort of important to define which hardware models our driver supports,
because it isn't all of them.  I think there are historical devices called =
QAT
with a different programming model that we do not support.  (Maybe I'm
mistaken; I'm sure Mark is more familiar.)

>From the OS perspective, qat is a generic PCIe device.  Sometimes it is par=
t of
a SoC, but I believe Intel has also produced installable PCIe board version=
s.=20
(I don't know if our driver supports those models or not.)  I don't think i=
t is
enumerated in CPU feature flags (dmesg), even on SoC models.

Leaving it to Mark but IMO this is NOTABUG.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-252984-227-0wyLN7MmiZ>