Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:30:04 GMT From: Hans <hm@hm.net.br> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/171850: Misleading pkg install option in fusefs-kmod Message-ID: <201209211430.q8LEU4Ll093890@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201209211440.q8LEe28B035651@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 171850 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Misleading pkg install option in fusefs-kmod >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Sep 21 14:40:02 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Hans >Release: 9-Stable >Organization: HM-Net TI Ltda >Environment: FreeBSD pop1.hm.net.br 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #7 r238716M: Wed Sep 19 06:07:26 BRT 2012 hmm@pop1.hm.net.br:/usr/obj/dados/src/sys/WIPMINI i386 >Description: Installing or upgrading fusefs-kmod shows the following option which is enabled by default: [X] Automatic global config file setup which then adds if not exists fusefs_enable="YES" to rc.conf that is not a good choice the option asks for setup, what is one thing enabling is a totally other thing I suggest that this behavior get changed, for example making the right question as [ ] Enabling Fusefs at boot time? and let it disabled by default >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201209211430.q8LEU4Ll093890>