Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 19:45:41 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: bde@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: removing support for ICC?? Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkyfaJjB=zU2qXvahuhMqzKSm2u72WehFVoJqNKSzxsVg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121107221730.000017c1@unknown> References: <CAF6rxgmTGsg6JMp5tswDGE4TZNcjirMJ8aiKLcSfd-ehbp_WYg@mail.gmail.com> <20121107221730.000017c1@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 November 2012 16:17, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:58:45 -0500 Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> > wrote: > >> Is there any reason to continue to keep the legacy __INTEL_COMPILER >> conditional includes around? > > Is there a reason to remove them from cdefs.h? There aren't a lot of > them, they don't obfuscate things, they are not in the way of improving > things, they don't make the existing stuff harder to read. ... > cdefs.h is not only used in the kernel, but also in the userland. > Anything from userland which includes cdefs.h and may also compile on > other operating systems benefits from keeping this support in cdefs.h. I just noticed this ancient stuff in src and decided to clean it up. Since it is clearly needed, I'll drop it. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkyfaJjB=zU2qXvahuhMqzKSm2u72WehFVoJqNKSzxsVg>