Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:36:48 +0200
From:      "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org>
To:        "Kris Kennaway" <kris@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Kernel panic on PowerEdge 1950 under certain stress load
Message-ID:  <9bbcef730709251136j24bacae2j9b1e216d58fee10@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <46F94B6C.2090107@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <c53be070709211526j2178ebb7ia6ea39e1a5df303c@mail.gmail.com> <fd84qf$ejl$1@sea.gmane.org> <c53be070709240842h6875d45ct761d0fa5790f70e2@mail.gmail.com> <46F8D12E.7060202@FreeBSD.org> <fdavot$eic$1@sea.gmane.org> <46F94B6C.2090107@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25/09/2007, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Not in the sense of transmuting a sleep mutex into a spin mutex, no.
> sleep mutexes will spin when the lock holder is currently running, but
> this happens within the context of the mtx_lock_sleep function itself.

Ok, thanks, this clears things a bit for me.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9bbcef730709251136j24bacae2j9b1e216d58fee10>