Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Oct 2001 12:28:52 -0400
From:      The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org>
To:        Chad David <davidc@acns.ab.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: new ipfw command
Message-ID:  <20011003122851.A497@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011002234438.A94897@colnta.internal>
References:  <20011002234438.A94897@colnta.internal>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Tue Oct 02, 2001 at 11:44:38PM -0600, Chad David wrote:
>
> 4) The code is modular enough to be useful to someone who
>    didn't write it.

And I like this one.. :) Currently, ipfw has a good amount of prs open
that are not commited or fixed. I htink this might be due to the
spaghetti nature of the code. 

Having a clean implementation woulnd't hurt at all, go for it!

I'm not sure it would make it in the base system though. :(

A.

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAju7PMIACgkQttcWHAnWiGdLNACeOdNSBl3j3mzpQ6SD7JkEoU2j
BrkAniPSGU81jY/KWftR4vDOrbxHNupX
=ajep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011003122851.A497>