Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 02:54:59 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Brian Somers <brian@freebsd-services.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposed patch to log_accum.pl Message-ID: <20010914025459.E29860@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200109140151.f8E1prd00702@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from brian@freebsd-services.com on Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:51:53AM %2B0100 References: <joe@tao.org.uk> <200109140151.f8E1prd00702@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:51:53AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've attached a patch to CVSROOT/log_accum.pl that I'd like comments on > > before I commit it. > > > > At the moment we get a summary line for each modified file in the commit > > email, i.e.: > > =20 > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.108 +6 -5 src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c > > > > The attached patch caused us to also get these lines for added and > > removed files. It's been suggested that the revision number be followed > > with "(dead)" in the case of removed files. Is this necessary? > > I think something like: > > Revision Changes Path > 1.108 +6 -5 src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c > 1.1 +123 src/sys/kern/new_file.c > 1.234 -669 src/sys/kern/dead_file.c > > is sufficient. That makes good sense. Anything else? Joe [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjuhY3MACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZ6DwCfc2gGfK+7g0WEfDk2KiZrTJau 0E0An3ahQHMz/5OttY+yxVCsH0zet5rm =FCoC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010914025459.E29860>