Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:33:00 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssh Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912060031120.7201-100000@green.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <199912060526.WAA23865@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > I'm already open to all the same risks, since the "patches" contain > > parts of the OpenSSH code. Either none of the port is RESTRICTED, or > > the port _itself_ is RESTRICTED. Preventing the export of the package > > (containing the code in machine-usable format), since some of the code > > is exported in other ways (files/, patches/, etc), is nonsensical. > > If it were my butt on the line (it's not), I'd make the entire port > RESTRICTED, including the mirroring of it. My butt is confident in the judicial system. > > But, you'll have to take that up with the lawyers for WC as well as all > of the other mirror sites. > International $&^!# _ports_ repository? The "restrictions" here make me sick. > > Nate -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9912060031120.7201-100000>