Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:03:16 +0000
From:      "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_tap.c
Message-ID:  <45C77164.1020801@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <45C72761.2010402@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200702030257.l132vkfT089439@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070205124332.GG1621@FreeBSD.org> <45C72761.2010402@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> ...
>> Moreover, in case of promisc + net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 our box will 
>> resend
>> all the received foreign packets :(
>>   
>
> NetBSD has M_PROMISC presumably for detecting situations like this:
>    http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/ident?v=NETBSD&i=M_PROMISC

The other cool thing is the opportunities for functional separation 
which it offers.

For example: wi(4) is known to have a broken IFF_ALLMULTI mode, as do 
other cards. If we added an ifnet capability 'has working hardware 
allmulti', M_PROMISC lets you do the right thing in either case at the 
cost of checking a bit.

Rehards,
BMS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45C77164.1020801>