Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:46:56 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Bruce Cran <brucec@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r218909 - in head: bin/df bin/sh lib/libc/arm/gen lib/libc/ia64/gen lib/libc/mips/gen lib/libc/powerpc/gen lib/libc/powerpc64/gen lib/libpkg lib/libstand lib/msun/src sys/amd64/amd64 sy... Message-ID: <201103111346.56499.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201102210901.p1L91YoI063173@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201102210901.p1L91YoI063173@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, February 21, 2011 4:01:34 am Bruce Cran wrote: > Author: brucec > Date: Mon Feb 21 09:01:34 2011 > New Revision: 218909 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/218909 > > Log: > Fix typos - remove duplicate "the". > > PR: bin/154928 > Submitted by: Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com> > MFC after: 3 days A few of these weren't just duplicates but were actually using 'the' when they should have been using some other word instead: > Modified: head/lib/libpkg/version.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/lib/libpkg/version.c Mon Feb 21 05:10:34 2011 (r218908) > +++ head/lib/libpkg/version.c Mon Feb 21 09:01:34 2011 (r218909) > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ split_version(const char *pkgname, const > if (pkgname == NULL) > errx(2, "%s: Passed NULL pkgname.", __func__); > > - /* Look for the last '-' the the pkgname */ > + /* Look for the last '-' the pkgname */ > ch = strrchr(pkgname, '-'); > /* Cheat if we are just passed a version, not a valid package name */ > versionstr = ch ? ch + 1 : pkgname; This is not a double the, it should be "Look for the last '-' in the pkgname". > Modified: head/sys/dev/drm/r300_reg.h > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/dev/drm/r300_reg.h Mon Feb 21 05:10:34 2011 (r218908) > +++ head/sys/dev/drm/r300_reg.h Mon Feb 21 09:01:34 2011 (r218909) > @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); > # define R300_PVS_CNTL_1_PROGRAM_START_SHIFT 0 > # define R300_PVS_CNTL_1_POS_END_SHIFT 10 > # define R300_PVS_CNTL_1_PROGRAM_END_SHIFT 20 > -/* Addresses are relative the the vertex program parameters area. */ > +/* Addresses are relative the vertex program parameters area. */ > #define R300_VAP_PVS_CNTL_2 0x22D4 > # define R300_PVS_CNTL_2_PARAM_OFFSET_SHIFT 0 > # define R300_PVS_CNTL_2_PARAM_COUNT_SHIFT 16 I think this should be "Addresses are relative to the vertex ...". > Modified: head/sys/dev/ep/if_epreg.h > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/dev/ep/if_epreg.h Mon Feb 21 05:10:34 2011 (r218908) > +++ head/sys/dev/ep/if_epreg.h Mon Feb 21 09:01:34 2011 (r218909) > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ > /************************************************************************** > * * > * These are the registers for the 3Com 3c509 and their bit patterns when * > - * applicable. They have been taken out the the "EtherLink III Parallel * > + * applicable. They have been taken out the "EtherLink III Parallel * > * Tasking EISA and ISA Technical Reference" "Beta Draft 10/30/92" manual * > * from 3com. * > * * I think this should be 'Then have been taken out of the "Etherlink III...' > Modified: head/sys/dev/vx/if_vxreg.h > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/dev/vx/if_vxreg.h Mon Feb 21 05:10:34 2011 (r218908) > +++ head/sys/dev/vx/if_vxreg.h Mon Feb 21 09:01:34 2011 (r218909) > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ > > /************************************************************************** > * These are the registers for the 3Com 3c509 and their bit patterns when * > - * applicable. They have been taken out the the "EtherLink III Parallel * > + * applicable. They have been taken out the "EtherLink III Parallel * > * Tasking EISA and ISA Technical Reference" "Beta Draft 10/30/92" manual * > * from 3com. * > **************************************************************************/ Same as above. "out of the" rather than "out the" > Modified: head/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/xfs_dir_leaf.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/xfs_dir_leaf.c Mon Feb 21 05:10:34 2011 (r218908) > +++ head/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/xfs_dir_leaf.c Mon Feb 21 09:01:34 2011 (r218909) > @@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@ xfs_dir_leaf_getdents_int( > } > > /* > - * Format a dirent64 structure and copy it out the the user's buffer. > + * Format a dirent64 structure and copy it out the user's buffer. > */ > int > xfs_dir_put_dirent64_direct(xfs_dir_put_args_t *pa) > @@ -2185,7 +2185,7 @@ xfs_dir_put_dirent64_direct(xfs_dir_put_ > } > > /* > - * Format a dirent64 structure and copy it out the the user's buffer. > + * Format a dirent64 structure and copy it out the user's buffer. > */ > int > xfs_dir_put_dirent64_uio(xfs_dir_put_args_t *pa) I think these should both be "out to the user's buffer". > Modified: head/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/socket/ng_btsocket_rfcomm.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/socket/ng_btsocket_rfcomm.c Mon Feb 21 05:10:34 2011 (r218908) > +++ head/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/socket/ng_btsocket_rfcomm.c Mon Feb 21 09:01:34 2011 (r218909) > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ ng_btsocket_rfcomm_connect(struct socket > soclose(l2so); /* we don't need new L2CAP socket */ > > /* > - * Check if we already have the same DLCI the the same session > + * Check if we already have the same DLCI the same session > */ > > mtx_lock(&s->session_mtx); Not 100% sure, but I think the first "the" here should have been changed to something else like "within", "in", "from", etc. emax@ might be the best person to ask. > Modified: head/usr.bin/make/lst.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/usr.bin/make/lst.c Mon Feb 21 05:10:34 2011 (r218908) > +++ head/usr.bin/make/lst.c Mon Feb 21 09:01:34 2011 (r218909) > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Lst_Append(Lst *list, LstNode *ln, void > * LST_CONCLINK if should just be relinked > * > * Side Effects: > - * New elements are created and appended the the first list. > + * New elements are created and appended the first list. > */ > void > Lst_Concat(Lst *list1, Lst *list2, int flags) I think this should be "appended to the first list" -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201103111346.56499.jhb>