Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:33:19 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: "Expensive timeout(9) function..." Message-ID: <20030401123319.GA8399@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, I'm getting the following DIAGNOSTIC messages on my -CURRENT box: Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc02677e0(0) 0.006095064 s (it's uma_timeout(), which triggers the warning once per boot) Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0141610(0xc0dfcc00) 0.006581587 s Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0141610(0xc0dfcc00) 0.008510173 s (and this one is fxp_tick(); it triggers the warning from time to time) Are those warnings harmless? As far as my understanding of the issue reaches, a timeout function is called under protection of the Giant mutex unless it's marked as MP-safe, and that's the reason to spend as little time as possible in it. Right? -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030401123319.GA8399>