Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 20:09:06 GMT From: Thrumbar@Worldnet.att.net (Thrumbar Pathfinder) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Berkeley DB 1.85 --> 2.0 Message-ID: <3746628e.2366261@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> In-Reply-To: <199905132050.QAA10438@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <19990513164720.A26399@trinsec.com> <199905132050.QAA10438@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Could you be more specific on what part of the license is so unfriendly????? Thrumbar@Worldnet.att.net On Thu, 13 May 1999 16:50:17 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: ><<On Thu, 13 May 1999 16:47:20 -0400, Dan Moschuk <dan@trinsec.com> said: > >> Out of curiosity, is there a reason we are still using Berkeley DB v1.85 as >> apposed to v2? > >Yes. v2 has an unfriendly license. > >-GAWollman > >-- >Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same >wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom >Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame >MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3746628e.2366261>